A look at his Test centuries and you find out that the record is even worse.
Some of my readers have insisted that I take a look at the master blaster’s Test centuries record instead of ODIs. This has encouraged me to write this article as a continuation to my previous article about Tendulkar’s Century Myth which examined his ODI centuries and was published on my blog a few days back.
India is currently at the number 1 spot in Test cricket with their star batsman looking for his 100th international century in the 100th Test between India and England. Presently Tendulkar has 48 ODI centuries and 51 Test centuries. 11 of his Test centuries are against Australia, 9 against Sri Lanka, 7 against South Africa and England, 5 against Bangladesh, 4 against New Zealand, 3 each against West Indies and Zimbabwe and 2 against Pakistan.
But looking more closely, out of the 51 Test centuries that Tendulkar has scored, only 20 have won India the game, 11 times India has lost and 20 times the match was a draw. This brings Tendulkar’s winning percentage of centuries in Test Cricket to only 39.21%.
On the contrary, Pakistan’s Inzamam-ul-Haq has 25 Test centuries out of which 17 times Pakistan has won, 6 times the match was a draw and only 2 centuries were in matches where Pakistan lost. This brings the winning percentage to 68%. Furthermore, most of the centuries scored by Inzamam were in crunch situations where his team needed him most. Now if you compare the total centuries, Sachin has more than double the number of centuries, but of what good use to the team if they are not for the winning cause.
Looking at Tendulkar’s centuries in more detail, 8 are against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. If we leave them out then out of 43 centuries only 14 have helped India win. Below is the complete list of Tendulkar’s 51 Test Centuries and their effect on the outcome of the match.
.No |
Score |
Against |
.Inn |
Venue |
Result |
1 |
*119 |
England |
2 |
Away |
Draw |
2 |
*148 |
Australia |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
3 |
114 |
Australia |
1 |
Away |
Lost |
4 |
111 |
South Africa |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
5 |
165 |
England |
1 |
Home |
Won |
6 |
*104 |
Sri Lanka |
2 |
Away |
Won |
7 |
142 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Home |
Won |
8 |
179 |
West Indies |
1 |
Home |
Draw |
9 |
122 |
England |
2 |
Away |
Lost |
10 |
177 |
England |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
11 |
169 |
South Africa |
1 |
Away |
Lost |
12 |
143 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
13 |
139 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
14 |
148 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Home |
Draw |
15 |
*155 |
Australia |
2 |
Home |
Won |
16 |
177 |
Australia |
1 |
Home |
Lost |
17 |
113 |
New Zealand |
2 |
Away |
Lost |
18 |
136 |
Pakistan |
2 |
Home |
Lost |
19 |
*124 |
Sri Lanka |
2 |
Away |
Draw |
20 |
*126 |
New Zealand |
2 |
Home |
Draw |
21 |
217 |
New Zealand |
1 |
Home |
Draw |
22 |
116 |
Australia |
1 |
Away |
Lost |
23 |
122 |
Zimbabwe |
1 |
Home |
Won |
24 |
*201 |
Zimbabwe |
1 |
Home |
Draw |
25 |
126 |
Australia |
1 |
Home |
Won |
26 |
155 |
South Africa |
1 |
Away |
Lost |
27 |
103 |
England |
1 |
Home |
Draw |
28 |
176 |
Zimbabwe |
1 |
Home |
Won |
29 |
117 |
West Indies |
1 |
Away |
Won |
30 |
193 |
England |
1 |
Away |
Won |
31 |
176 |
West Indies |
2 |
Home |
Draw |
32 |
*241 |
Australia |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
33 |
*194 |
Pakistan |
1 |
Away |
Won |
34 |
*248 |
Bangladesh |
1 |
Away |
Won |
35 |
109 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Home |
Won |
36 |
101 |
Bangladesh |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
37 |
*122 |
Bangladesh |
1 |
Away |
Won |
38 |
*154 |
Australia |
1 |
Away |
Lost |
39 |
153 |
Australia |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
40 |
109 |
Australia |
1 |
Home |
Won |
41 |
*103 |
England |
2 |
Home |
Won |
42 |
160 |
New Zealand |
1 |
Away |
Won |
43 |
*100 |
Sri Lanka |
2 |
Home |
Draw |
44 |
*105 |
Bangladesh |
1 |
Away |
Won |
45 |
143 |
Bangladesh |
1 |
Away |
Won |
46 |
100 |
South Africa |
2 |
Home |
Lost |
47 |
106 |
South Africa |
1 |
Home |
Won |
48 |
203 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
49 |
214 |
Australia |
1 |
Home |
Won |
50 |
*111 |
South Africa |
2 |
Away |
Lost |
51 |
146 |
South Africa |
1 |
Away |
Draw |
Also Read About Tendulkar’s ODI Centuries Myth
If he scores a century in this match, I hope india doesn’t loose.
Jawad..its seems you dont love crikcet…you are just trying to put very biased analysis…and n fact going by your own analysis…Sachin has scored 15 centuries in Australia, South Africa, England & New Zealand…all other vistors batsman struggle to get runs on these tracks….inzamam cannot even Dream of scoring these many hundreds n these countries…how many hundreds he has scored n Australia & South Africa…you will fall on your own face.
Please stop comparing a greatest batsman with other good batsmans like inzamam and Mahela.
Anyone can easily make out from where you come…and its only jealousy which is creatng lot of smoke in you blog…please stop writng these idiotic blogs…its no way going to harm the greatness of Sachin Tendulkar.
agreed
Sachin Tendulkar is the critics favorite pick. So you another joining the band wagon is it? I may have a different opinion on the content, however appreciate your work.
Lol. You think its tennis where only one man play and you can put the blame on him if lose occurs? Dude, what about the other 10 members? How can you win if you score a century and other 10 players play rubbish? Doesn’t it makes sense?
Are you trying to say that India’s other 10 players are rubbish
I think more possibly, the tests India has won with Tendulkar providing a century, i think its because someone else has played a more pivotal role. I’m a great fan on tendulkar and cricket but unfortunately its true
this is ridiculous , most of his career inzamam had waqar, wasim, shoaib, saqlain to blow the opposition away, no wonder he has more centuries in games won. i am willing to bet that tendulkar has similar centuries that ended in draws because india did not have good bowlers.
here are his centuries in wins.
135 vs NZ, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63635.html
Wasim an Waqar 16 wickets between them
100 vs SL , http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63653.html
Wasim and Waqar 16 wickets betwen them
100 vs Zimbabwe, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63674.html
the match was even, you can take it or leave it , big red mark —> zimbabwe
148, vs Eng, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63716.html
good one here,
177, against WI http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63773.html
featherbed pitch, again Wasim and Waqar took 10 otherwise would have been a draw
200, against SL, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63833.html
featherbed pitch, without an alround attack with Shoaib, Saqlain, Wasim, match would have been a draw
138, against SL, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63874.html
good one here , he did play well.
112, against SL, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63886.html
featherbed would be a draw, even Wasim Akram got a 100, again Wasim and Waqar take 10 wickets to beat the opposition
114, against Eng, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63933.html
good one here. good alround high scoring match by both teams
105, against Bangladesh, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63946.html
buffet match, 5 centurions,
329 against NZ, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63989.html
good one here, brilliant bowling by Shoaib akthar kaneria, saqlain, made it a no contest.
112, Zimb http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64016.html
hey this is a good performance, —-> zimbabwe
138, Bangladesh, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64045.html
heroic win, against a pathetic team, this is like ganguly scoring a century to save india from wobbles against namibia or kenya in World cup 2003 semifinal.
118, vs India, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64082.html
good one here, i will give you this one, no two points about it
117, vs SL, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64106.html
good one here
184, vs India, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64127.html
good one here
117, vs WI, http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/210368.html
good one here
If I count his centuries in wins
good ones wins against teams other than Zim & Bdesh = 8
winning centuries against Zim & Bdesh = 4
centuries where a draw would have occurred if not for the bowling = 5
Even going by your statistic, if we leave Zim & Bdesh, he has, 8+5 13 centuries in wins.
and by your own stats sachin has 14 centuries in wins.
If you look at sachin’s centuries in draws, many have come where india made a big total, and our bowlers could not get the opposition out, even the last one sahin scored 146, india couldnt get kallis in the 2nd innings and a draw resulted.
if sachin had played for pakistan he would have had more centuries to wins ratio.
i see one glaring problem with inzamam , he has no winning centuries against Australia or S. Africa.
sachin has 5 against them.
This is the reason inzy is not mentioned as a great player, good player, even chanderpaul has scored 8000 runs
but yes inzy has been great against SL 5 centuries against Sachin’s 3.
in my opinion, lara’s highs were higher than anyone, sachin has been the most consistent.
I would double it..
Sachin Tendulkar is a great Batsman and i don’t think he needs to prove to the comments from his critics. He has performed well on highest level for more than 2 decades none of the player has done so well for so many years in International Cricket. One flop series doesn’t mean he is not greatest batsmen or cant score runs.
I want say same words written previously. But gud work
I want say same words written upwards